Trust
How AI Flow Harbor writes and fixes its articles.
The site is written around practical work, not product press releases. A guide should explain the job, the tested condition, the failure case, and what a reader can safely try next.
Before publishing
A draft is not treated as ready just because it reads well. I check whether the advice survives a real input, a review point, and a handoff.
- At least one concrete work sample
- Official or primary sources for volatile claims
- A visible failure signal, not only benefits
What does not pass
A guide needs its own work example, source check, and failure signal before it is published as advice.
- Categories lead to useful pages
- No unsupported earnings or productivity promises
- No hidden sponsor framing
After publishing
Dates, features, pricing, and links are allowed to change. When a reader flags an issue, I check the source and update the page rather than leaving stale advice in place.
- Correction requests go through contact
- Substantive updates keep review dates visible
- Broken links and changed plans are prioritized