Trust

How AI Flow Harbor writes and fixes its articles.

A plain look at what we check before publishing, what we update later, and how readers can flag mistakes.

Trust

How AI Flow Harbor writes and fixes its articles.

The site is written around practical work, not product press releases. A guide should explain the job, the tested condition, the failure case, and what a reader can safely try next.

Before publishing

A draft is not treated as ready just because it reads well. I check whether the advice survives a real input, a review point, and a handoff.

  • At least one concrete work sample
  • Official or primary sources for volatile claims
  • A visible failure signal, not only benefits

What does not pass

A guide needs its own work example, source check, and failure signal before it is published as advice.

  • Categories lead to useful pages
  • No unsupported earnings or productivity promises
  • No hidden sponsor framing

After publishing

Dates, features, pricing, and links are allowed to change. When a reader flags an issue, I check the source and update the page rather than leaving stale advice in place.

  • Correction requests go through contact
  • Substantive updates keep review dates visible
  • Broken links and changed plans are prioritized

What you will find

Use this page to choose the next practical step.

A plain look at what we check before publishing, what we update later, and how readers can flag mistakes.

  1. 01 What We Check
  2. 02 What We Do Not Claim
  3. 03 How To Report A Mistake
  4. 04 When Pages Are Refreshed